« Free Culture linksFree culture and lobbyists »

Free Culture and file sharing

05/18/04 | by [mail] | Categories: culture/news

No up-to-date book on copyright law would be complete without a section on music file-sharing. Free Culture doesn't deal with it much, but Lessig does have some comments in the afterword that are worth repeating. He says that file=sharing is a complicated problem because there are different types of sharing.

A. There are some who are using sharing networks as substitutes for purchasing CDs.

B. There are also some who are using sharing networks to sample, on the way to purchasing CDs.

C. There are many who are using file-sharing networks to get access to content that is no longer sold but is still under copyright or that would have been too cumbersome to buy off the Net.

D. There are many who are using file-sharing networks to get access to content that is not copyrighted or to get access that the copyright owner plainly endorses
(302).

Type A sharing is illegal and for good reason. It's still up for debate whether file sharing hurts cd sales, but this type of sharing goes against the spirit and the letter of copyright law, which is designed to promote progress by giving artists access to the benefits of their creation. Type D sharing is totally legal and very useful. The tricky thing for lawmakers and programmers is to find a way to cut down on type A sharing without inhibiting type D. But what about types B and C, are they wrong? Is downloading a song to see if you want to buy a cd any worse than listening to the radio? Is downloading a song that can't be bought on cd any different from rescuing a tape from the dumpster behind the record store? The RIAA wants to fight type A sharing, but they treat all p2p sharing as if it were this type. They don't care about the fact that Napster had several legal uses. If the different kinds of sharing can be understood, then maybe we can come up with some reasonable regulations.

I should also point out that when the big companies and lobbyists start panicing about piracy, they're usually wrong. They were sure that the VCR would decimate the box office. It didn't. They thought CD burners would eliminate CD sales. Nope. Now they're saying the DVD burners and back-up software will kill DVD sales. Don't count on it. And p2p file sharing won't send P. Diddy to the poorhouse

Permalink

3 comments

bam-a-fied


Henry [Visitor]http://honzo.brendoman.com05/18/04 @ 18:05

unless he hires more umbrella-holders. i hear they are forming a union.


sara [Visitor]http://danny.brendoman.com05/18/04 @ 22:19

Well said.
In some ways, I want the RIAA to “win” - alienate their best customers, who grow jaded and cynical about the whole thing, stop buying music at all, then the whole industry grinds to a halt selling nothing but novelty records and Christmas singles (both categories bought by strange aunts as presents)


Steve [Visitor]http://steve-parker.org/05/20/04 @ 06:49


Form is loading...