I made a comment on a post on Kyle's site, and it got so long that I might as well put it here, too. Read this first: Ordering Narnia. Then my response:

When we bought the boxed set 4-5 years ago, they were in chronological order. But we did some research and read them in the order they were published. I think it was the best way to go. But keep in mind that The Magician's Nephew, the first book chronologically, also gradually introduces the reader to the world of Narnia through the eyes of a child. There's plenty of mystery and suspense. Lion is still the best intro and Nephew is better as a back story.

I agree with most of what you're saying. Another example. When I was going to read some Tolkien for the first time I was about 15. I asked someone which book comes first and they told me it was The Silmarillion. But don't start there, they said. Start with the Hobbit. But I was 15 and I knew everything, so I started with the first book chronologically. I plowed my way through, but needless to say, I wasn't interested in any more Tolkien for a great while. Someone at Truman introduced me to Tolkien properly and I read The Hobbit and the trilogy with great relish. Later I came back to the prequel and enjoyed it more for what it is, a history and a back story.

Somewhere along the line we became interested in telling and hearing stories in the order that they happened. But the best stories have always been told out of order. I'm reading Odyssey now and it's all out of order. Tolkien was the same way, as is Harry Potter.

Would history books be more effective if they took this same route? You could introduce the reader to the current world and make each history lesson a tangent that gives a bit more of the back story.

I posted a report of the game night at BoardGameGeek.com:

October 29 Game Night

The Credit Card Prank
The Credit Card Prank Part II

This guy was able to sign his credit card receipts in all kinds of crazy ways, because nobody ever checks the signature. Does that make you feel safe?

This Saturday, October 29, 2005, at 8 pm we're going to play some games at my house. If you want to come, RSVP with a comment or an email. Matt K. has some new games we'll be trying out: Ticket to Ride Europe, Puerto Rico, Settlers of Catan Seafarers expansion and 2005 Spiel des Jahres winner Niagara. I'm hoping to get six people geeky and brave enough to play Cosmic Encounter during the night. Be there.

Mirror.co.uk - News - TERRORISED.. BY A 10FT TOILET SNAKE

I think I'll just hold it in from now on.

(via J-Walk)

After a generally crappy day, this made me smile:

Made up words from the Simposns

iTunes 6 has no way to import a DVD into the library. But I found this guide for ripping a DVD to a format that you can import to iTunes, then sync with the iPod. The same site also has a guide for converting any downloaded video for the iPod using ffmpegX, another free program that I already have installed. So, a person could wait until the next day and download one of 5 shows from the music store at half of the normal tv resolution for $1.99, or they could use BitTorrent to start downloading almost any show on tv about an hour after it airs, and get it for free in High Definition, then use ffmpegX to convert it if they want to watch it on the iPod. Hmm. Not that I would bother with any of this when I can watch the show on my tv. The important thing is that it will be possible to take content you already have and put it on the iPod. Not easy, exactly, but possible.

Edit: Looks like the video iPod has been confirmed. They also announced iTunes 6, music videos and tv episodes for sale in the music store and a media center add-on for the iMac. Details are still filtering in, but let's see how it compares to my expectations.

Apple rumor site Think Secret first reported that today's media event would not be to announce the highly anticipated video iPod from Apple. There have been hints that Apple will release an iPod-like device capable of playing back videos, not the least of which has been that iTunes has added support for playing videos. But now Think Secret is saying that it may be a video iPod that is announced today at 10am PDT after all. Many people have said that Apple wouldn't release a new iPod when the Nano is selling so well. But I think they'll be different enough products that they won't be in competition. I thought I might take part in the speculation and lay out what I would like to see in this product (whether it's announced today or later on).

1. An easy way to put my DVDs on the device. iTunes already lets me make a copy of a cd and store it on my computer or copy it to a portable device. It would be disappointing if the vPod didn't do this just as easily with DVDs. I know the movie studios would fight this, though. This functionality could come in the form of a new version of iTunes or a new app altogether.
Edit: There's still no word on whether iTunes 6 will be able to do these things.

2. A/V-out connections. This one should be no problem since it is already included in the iPod Photo. If I have video on the device I won't always want to watch it on the built-in screen. It should be easy to hook it up to a TV.
Edit: Check.

3. Big screen, small form factor. There's a delicate balance somewhere between being too bulky and having a screen that's too small to enjoy video on. If anyone can strike that balance, it's the designers at Apple.
Edit: I haven't seen a confirmed picture yet, but the screen is 2.5", 320x240, and it's thinner than the old iPod.

4. Some kind of way to interface with a DVR. I'm dreaming here, but it would be nice to dump the latest episode of the Daily Show from my Tivo onto the portable device to watch on a car ride or something. I doubt this will happen with Tivo, but maybe someone will make a MythTV plugin that can do this.
Edit: Probably not. But buying tv shows is an interesting alternative. Not that I'm going to pay $1.99 to watch something on a tiny screen that I can watch on a bigger screen for free.

5. Decent price. The high-end 60 GB iPod is currently $399. That's already a lot. They're not adding much more than some software changes and a bigger screen. $449 would be nice, $499 would be bearable, but anything else would be pushing it.
Edit: 30GB will be $299, 60GB will be $399. Better than I expected.

6. 80 GB hard drive. It's already well-known that Apple has access to tiny drives of this capacity. This should be a no-brainer. Video takes up a lot more space than audio.
Edit: This will have to come in a later update. 60 GB is still pretty good.

That's what I would like to see. If the new product matches this description, then I'll take it as a sign from on high that I should buy one. I guess we'll find out later today.

Edit: Here's a picture of one alongside the Nano. It's not much bigger than a Nano.

World Beard and Moustache Championship

I don't have anything funny to add to this picture and link. I'm just happy that this competition exists.

(via J-Walk's Blog)

I've been playing around with Speech Commands in Mac OS X. It's really fun. It has most of the basic commands you need already built in. As soon as I enabled speech commands I could say "switch to Firefox" into my microphone and it would switch applications and show me Firefox. You can navigate the menus and do some basic interaction with applications.

My favorite so far has been chess. I can open the chess application and play a whole game against the computer, all without touching the keyboard and mouse. I demonstrated this for Sara and she's doing a really good job at concealing her amazement.

But with a little customizing I've been able to do even more. Each program has its own speech commands available to it. Safari has one called "Make this page speakable." I figured out that I can copy the little file it makes to the Firefox folder, or better yet, the Everywhere folder. Now I can say "Check my Gmail" from any application and it pops Firefox to the front and opens up my inbox in a new tab.

You can download more speech commands (though I haven't found many good ones) or you can roll your own using AppleScript. But a much easier solution is to define keyboard commands. If it can be done with a keyboard command, then you can attach it to a phrase to make it speakable. I did Command+W with "Close tab" for Firefox, and Space with "Pause the movie" and "Play the movie" in VLC. This one is nice for when I'm laying on my couch watching a Doctor Who episode on my computer, wearing my headset. I just say "Pause movie. Fullscreen mode. Check my Gmail. Close tab. Switch to VLC. Fullscreen mode. Play movie." All that without even getting up or even lifting a finger.

It's more than just laziness and novelty that has made me look into this. I've been fighting a case of RSI, and the less I use my mouse and keyboard at home, the better.

Speech commands don't let me do any typing with my voice, but there are a couple of products for under $100 that do dictation for the Mac OS: Via Voice and iListen. The more popular Dragon Naturally Speaking is only available for Windows.