Personman - Latest Comments on Sarah Palin http://personman.com/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 frank [Visitor] in response to: Sarah Palin Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:29:48 +0000 frank [Visitor] c81643@http://personman.com/ <p>Mister browlands when your knee is bowed before the almighty God you WILL believe. May God have mercy on you.</p> Mister browlands when your knee is bowed before the almighty God you WILL believe. May God have mercy on you.

]]> http://personman.com/sarah-palin#c81643 browlands@lynxpm.com [Visitor] in response to: Sarah Palin Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:24:12 +0000 browlands@lynxpm.com [Visitor] c81580@http://personman.com/ <p>There really is no god or gods. Believing in a god or gods is just wishful thinking. I don&#8217;t even know what all this fuss is about.</p> <p><a href="mailto:browlands@lynxpm.com">browlands@lynxpm.com</a><br /> 877-955-7711 x 80</p> There really is no god or gods. Believing in a god or gods is just wishful thinking. I don’t even know what all this fuss is about.

browlands@lynxpm.com
877-955-7711 x 80

]]> http://personman.com/sarah-palin#c81580 greg [Visitor] in response to: Sarah Palin Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:09:07 +0000 greg [Visitor] c81561@http://personman.com/ <p>Good entry.</p> <p>Palin was a Hail Mary in a way. Bold move, but after the uniting, and very excellent Dem convention, McCain needed to do something.</p> <p>A couple of things, though.</p> <p>First off, there&#8217;s no doubt that McCain vetted her. There&#8217;s no doubt that the first thing he wanted to know about was the Highway Trooper Scandal, and Bristol&#8217;s pregnancy. McCain decided to go forward anyway. If he&#8217;s smart, he knows something we don&#8217;t. If he&#8217;s not smart, we&#8217;ll know pretty quick.</p> <p>As for Stevens, he&#8217;s done something for everyone in Washington over the last 40 years, so that&#8217;s not surprising. He is poison&#8230;you gotta be careful around him.</p> <p>As for Under God in the Pledge, she was referring to various speeches by John Adams and George Washington that used the phrase Under God (which were used in 1954 as support to add it to the Pledge.)</p> <p>As for sex ed&#8230;.There are three kinds of Sex Ed</p> <p>1. Abstinence Only (30% of schools)<br /> 2. Abstinence Plus (50%)<br /> 3. Abstinence not the most important thing (20%)</p> <p>Unfortunately for those wishing to use Bristol&#8217;s pregnancy for to argue against pure abstinence only education, it doesn&#8217;t work. In fact, it backfires. The education at Bristol&#8217;s high school is somewhere in between #2 and #3&#8230;.it&#8217;s definitely not #1.</p> <p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1622610" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1622610</a></p> <p>As for experience, the Republican talking points have been that Palin has more experience than Obama. The Democratic talking points have been Obama has more experience than Palin.</p> <p>Unfortunately for the Democrats, this is lose-lose for them. Either way, it demonstrates that Obama is very inexperienced against McCain, who is is actual opponent. I&#8217;m actually surprised that they keep going with the argument. In fact, the entire conversation that is occurring right now, debating the Dem. Presidential candidate vs. the Repubs VP Candidate is a winner for the GOP.</p> <p>So here&#8217;s where we are, will there be more things that come out, or are we done? If we&#8217;re done, it shouldn&#8217;t be too big. If we&#8217;re not done, then it could get problematic.</p> <p>I do agree that it could be a huge Geraldine-esque disaster.</p> <p>We&#8217;ll definitely know in 6 days, after the RNC convention</p> Good entry.

Palin was a Hail Mary in a way. Bold move, but after the uniting, and very excellent Dem convention, McCain needed to do something.

A couple of things, though.

First off, there’s no doubt that McCain vetted her. There’s no doubt that the first thing he wanted to know about was the Highway Trooper Scandal, and Bristol’s pregnancy. McCain decided to go forward anyway. If he’s smart, he knows something we don’t. If he’s not smart, we’ll know pretty quick.

As for Stevens, he’s done something for everyone in Washington over the last 40 years, so that’s not surprising. He is poison…you gotta be careful around him.

As for Under God in the Pledge, she was referring to various speeches by John Adams and George Washington that used the phrase Under God (which were used in 1954 as support to add it to the Pledge.)

As for sex ed….There are three kinds of Sex Ed

1. Abstinence Only (30% of schools)
2. Abstinence Plus (50%)
3. Abstinence not the most important thing (20%)

Unfortunately for those wishing to use Bristol’s pregnancy for to argue against pure abstinence only education, it doesn’t work. In fact, it backfires. The education at Bristol’s high school is somewhere in between #2 and #3….it’s definitely not #1.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1622610

As for experience, the Republican talking points have been that Palin has more experience than Obama. The Democratic talking points have been Obama has more experience than Palin.

Unfortunately for the Democrats, this is lose-lose for them. Either way, it demonstrates that Obama is very inexperienced against McCain, who is is actual opponent. I’m actually surprised that they keep going with the argument. In fact, the entire conversation that is occurring right now, debating the Dem. Presidential candidate vs. the Repubs VP Candidate is a winner for the GOP.

So here’s where we are, will there be more things that come out, or are we done? If we’re done, it shouldn’t be too big. If we’re not done, then it could get problematic.

I do agree that it could be a huge Geraldine-esque disaster.

We’ll definitely know in 6 days, after the RNC convention

]]> http://personman.com/sarah-palin#c81561 John [Visitor] in response to: Sarah Palin Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:39:59 +0000 John [Visitor] c81560@http://personman.com/ <p>Well written Danny.<br /> From way down here in Aus, I get the feeling that this &#8216;running mate&#8217; selection says more about McCain&#8217;s knee jerk driven lack of good judgment than it does about Palin.<br /> Was it a chase for the votes of those angry Hillary chicks?<br /> If this is &#8216;maverick&#8217; stuff then I wonder what else he comes up with before election day.</p> <p>Off topic but related&#8230;<br /> Zeldman just linked to a new poll tracking site that is informative and looks good.<br /> <a href="http://www.polltrack.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.polltrack.com/</a><br /> Ceers<br /> John</p> Well written Danny.
From way down here in Aus, I get the feeling that this ‘running mate’ selection says more about McCain’s knee jerk driven lack of good judgment than it does about Palin.
Was it a chase for the votes of those angry Hillary chicks?
If this is ‘maverick’ stuff then I wonder what else he comes up with before election day.

Off topic but related…
Zeldman just linked to a new poll tracking site that is informative and looks good.
http://www.polltrack.com/
Ceers
John

]]> http://personman.com/sarah-palin#c81560