Personman - Latest Comments on White House official Libby guilty http://personman.com/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 dan [Member] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:27:23 +0000 [Member] c44154@http://personman.com/ <p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I know that this is all still being sorted out. Even if it&#8217;s decided that the letter of the law wasn&#8217;t broken, you must admit that her career was ruined. She&#8217;ll never be able to serve covertly again. And it was all to get revenge for her husband debunking one of the biggest reasons we had for invading Iraq. If you want to defend the people who ruined a patriot&#8217;s career to protect a lie, then go right ahead. That&#8217;s not a position I would want to be in.</p> I’m not a lawyer, but I know that this is all still being sorted out. Even if it’s decided that the letter of the law wasn’t broken, you must admit that her career was ruined. She’ll never be able to serve covertly again. And it was all to get revenge for her husband debunking one of the biggest reasons we had for invading Iraq. If you want to defend the people who ruined a patriot’s career to protect a lie, then go right ahead. That’s not a position I would want to be in.

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44154 Dan [Visitor] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:12:13 +0000 Dan [Visitor] c44153@http://personman.com/ <p>Sorry. It hasn&#8217;t been shown - yet.</p> <p>It does appear that the AP on 3/17 as printed by msnbc does show some discrepancies in the testimonies. She didn&#8217;t dispatch her husband to Nigeria - according to her, but she did according to CIA and State department official&#8217;s testimonies.</p> <p>Also a blurb there that Ms Plame&#8217;s position did not fall under the legal definition of covert and that is why no one was charged with the leak. </p> Sorry. It hasn’t been shown - yet.

It does appear that the AP on 3/17 as printed by msnbc does show some discrepancies in the testimonies. She didn’t dispatch her husband to Nigeria - according to her, but she did according to CIA and State department official’s testimonies.

Also a blurb there that Ms Plame’s position did not fall under the legal definition of covert and that is why no one was charged with the leak.

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44153 jksterup [Member] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:15:41 +0000 [Member] c44152@http://personman.com/ <p>You might want to lay off the FOX News, capital-D Danny.</p> You might want to lay off the FOX News, capital-D Danny.

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44152 dan [Member] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:03:52 +0000 [Member] c44151@http://personman.com/ <p>No and no.</p> No and no.

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44151 Dan [Visitor] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:00:17 +0000 Dan [Visitor] c44150@http://personman.com/ <p>Wasn&#8217;t it shown that Valerie Plame was not covert at the time this all went down? Also wasn&#8217;t Ms Plame also shown to have committed perjury while under oath? </p> Wasn’t it shown that Valerie Plame was not covert at the time this all went down? Also wasn’t Ms Plame also shown to have committed perjury while under oath?

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44150 Heath [Visitor] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:24:37 +0000 Heath [Visitor] c44113@http://personman.com/ <p>I don&#8217;t think it is illegal for the president or vice-president to interfere or undermine an intelligence operation. For anybody else, it would have been.</p> I don’t think it is illegal for the president or vice-president to interfere or undermine an intelligence operation. For anybody else, it would have been.

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44113 Henry Michael [Visitor] in response to: White House official Libby guilty Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:41:28 +0000 Henry Michael [Visitor] c44062@http://personman.com/ <p>This is a note on the poll, I&#8217;d like to go with a guided evolution, but there is no option for that.</p> This is a note on the poll, I’d like to go with a guided evolution, but there is no option for that.

]]> http://personman.com/white_house_official_libby_guilty#c44062