Personman - Latest Comments on Debate fact check http://personman.com/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 gringo [Visitor] in response to: Debate fact check Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:39:31 +0000 gringo [Visitor] c945@http://personman.com/ <p>our &#8220;liberal&#8221; media. not liberal, not conservative&#8230; $$$$.</p> our “liberal” media. not liberal, not conservative… $$$$.

]]> http://personman.com/debate_fact_check#c945 Honzo [Visitor] in response to: Debate fact check Sun, 10 Oct 2004 05:51:13 +0000 Honzo [Visitor] c944@http://personman.com/ <p>ok, sorry then, I missunderstod you.</p> ok, sorry then, I missunderstod you.

]]> http://personman.com/debate_fact_check#c944 danny [Visitor] in response to: Debate fact check Sun, 10 Oct 2004 03:31:13 +0000 danny [Visitor] c943@http://personman.com/ <p>I&#8217;m not mad that Bush got $84 and I&#8217;m not mad that Kerry brought it up. I was saying that I didn&#8217;t like the way jounalists were telling the story without any research into the facts. The media just seems to repeat whatever both parties say without any comparison to truth and reality. That&#8217;s what makes me mad.</p> I’m not mad that Bush got $84 and I’m not mad that Kerry brought it up. I was saying that I didn’t like the way jounalists were telling the story without any research into the facts. The media just seems to repeat whatever both parties say without any comparison to truth and reality. That’s what makes me mad.

]]> http://personman.com/debate_fact_check#c943 Henry [Visitor] in response to: Debate fact check Sun, 10 Oct 2004 01:19:21 +0000 Henry [Visitor] c942@http://personman.com/ <p>I will agree on that the 900,000 small business owners does need to be ajusted, but Kerry is pointing out technicalities (how the heck do you spell that word?)</p> <p>From Fact Check.<b>org</b></p> <p>&#8220;A better figure comes from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, which recently calculated that the Kerry tax increase would hit roughly 471,000 small employers.&#8221;</p> <p>The tax hike would still kill or seriously hurt almost half a million small employers. How many people you thnk are employed by those small businesses? 10? 20? 40? I have no idea. But those tax hikes would cut out people from those employers.</p> I will agree on that the 900,000 small business owners does need to be ajusted, but Kerry is pointing out technicalities (how the heck do you spell that word?)

From Fact Check.org

“A better figure comes from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, which recently calculated that the Kerry tax increase would hit roughly 471,000 small employers.”

The tax hike would still kill or seriously hurt almost half a million small employers. How many people you thnk are employed by those small businesses? 10? 20? 40? I have no idea. But those tax hikes would cut out people from those employers.

]]> http://personman.com/debate_fact_check#c942 Henry [Visitor] in response to: Debate fact check Sun, 10 Oct 2004 01:11:37 +0000 Henry [Visitor] c941@http://personman.com/ <p>How does that make you mad?</p> <p>He made $84 dollars from his holdings in the &#8220;timber company".</p> <p>Kerry&#8217;s job figure? -1,600,000 jobs since the president took office.</p> <p>Real figure? -585,000 jobs.</p> <p>Which is the worse mistake? Is Kerry trying to scare you?</p> How does that make you mad?

He made $84 dollars from his holdings in the “timber company".

Kerry’s job figure? -1,600,000 jobs since the president took office.

Real figure? -585,000 jobs.

Which is the worse mistake? Is Kerry trying to scare you?

]]> http://personman.com/debate_fact_check#c941